Archive for the Category »History «

The title can be funny or can simply be thought of as an elusive dream. Yet, if the story of the Tagean-Tallano clan is true, we have the biggest amount of mined gold among all countries in the world and we can be the richest nation on earth once this is made public and used for national development.

According to the Tagean-Tallano clan, their great great great grandfather – King Luisong Tagean – left gold of about 700,000 metric tons in weight. The story is too good to be true but the supporting pieces of evidence are just too plenty for this to be considered a legend or a hoax. While I am not yet totally convinced that the story is true, I think this is definitely worth studying.

A document, among a multitude of supporting papers, published in Contact (Phoenix Review Journal) stated that the amount of the Tagean-Tallano gold is exactly 617,500 metric tons. The whereabouts of this gold is something I am yet to uncover but a signigicant portion of this (about 400,000 metric tons) was leased to the Philippine government under President Manuel Roxas to initiate the Central Bank of the Philippines, which rests there until now. I have known that a portion of this gold in the Central Bank was pulled out and transported to the Vatican thru the conspiracy of Ferdinand Marcos (the lawyer of the Tallanos) and a certain Rev. Fr. Sta. Romana (trusted by the Tallanos to become the caretaker of the Central Bank gold).

The Tagean-Tallano Gold

The Tagean-Tallano Gold

Fifty percent of the total amount of that gold, according to the document, will be for the Filipino people.  According to their computation based on the prevailing price of gold that time, this is equivalent to USD 4.7 trillion, enough for each of the 75 million Filipinos now to have  USD 62,667.00 per head. And, take note…this is just 50% of the total gold possessed by the Tagean-Tallano clan. If we take into account all the other resources we have along with this distributed wealth from this gold, we can have the highest per capita GNP in the whole world.

….

Definitely worth studying…. :) Keep following this blog for updates of my research on this interesting subject.

Tallano Foundation Website

Tallano Foundation Website

We all have been taught a certain version of our country’s history. But since the winners write history, the younger generations are at the mercy of what the winners have told us. Many of you may not be aware that there is a totally different version of history being told by those claiming to be descendants of the country’s pre-Hispanic Royal Family – the Tagean-Tallano clan. According to the accounts written in their website:

“Before the conquest of the Philippines by the tyrant Spaniards, who converted this formerly Muslim country to Christianity, there already existed a civilization which had an Oriental texture. ”

“The reign of the royal family of the Philippines had started as early in the 13th century, about 200 years yet before the Spanish came to our shores. The noble family was headed then by the late King Luisong Tagean married to Lamayan Bowan.”

“A further evidence that the archipelago was the property of the Royal Family was written in Sung and Ming dynasty between the year l368 to l644 AD by the Chinese Emperor Yung Lo. As a symbol for the respect and due recognition of the Chinese Empire to the nobility of the King over his land ownership and rulership of the archipelago, the Chinese Emperor gave him a gift of silk cloth and several tons of precious metals like gold and jewels as a token of tribute to the Noble King whose name, King Luisong Tagean, was adapted in the naming of the largest island in his honor, the island of Luzon. Foreign traders regarded him as the sole ruler over the Archipelago; his ownership remained as an historic landmark; he never gained any resistance or opposition of any kind from various tribes of the inhabitants, meaning they directly admitted that the vast land of the archipelago was owned by the Tagean-Tallano Royal Clan, who discovered, rebuilt, glorified and fortified it for thousands of years. The inhabitants of the islands of Visayas and Mindanao acknowledged his rule by paying their share of their harvest from the lands they were tilling for and in behalf of the Royal Family.”

Since we read about Sri Vijaya and Madjapahit empires covering much of the present day Malaysia and Indonesia before the arrival of Europeans in Southeast Asia, the claim that there was also a reigning royal family in the Philippine archipelago around those times is not far fetched. It’s just interesting that this supposedly wealthy royal family did not leave any archeological traces (like buildings, temples or tombs), quite unlike the other two empires I mentioned. However, it’s possible that we are yet to find evidences for such claims, once this is seriously investigated.

The family of King Luisong Tagean controlled many parts of the archipelago. Continuing with their story…:

“According to the Philippine Historical Commission; the entire Greater Manila area was under the territories of Namayan then some five (5) centuries ago which was divided into seven (7) districts which included said Greater Manila areas including the former Karilaya Island (now Quezon province), which include the whole region of Kawit (now Cavite) and that lake region; the province of Laguna including portions of Batangas (Bumbon province before).”

“The origin of their inhabitants from mentioned places came from the noble family names Lacan-Tagean centuries ago and by his wife Lamayan Bowan. The noble tribes were the owners of said territories and they controlled the areas and inhabited it themselves for more than five (5) centuries ago and it was passed by more than ten (10) generations of their clans. Some of these were their children and grand children, like the names of Rajah Lacan-Tagean, the 11th son of Rajah Soliman who is married to Mary Anne Dent, the beautiful daughter of Alfred Dent, a British Lord. Rajah Soliman is the second son of the King who controlled the entire area of Manila and its suburbs including the provinces of Rizal, Bulacan, Cavite, Batangas, Laguna and Quezon.”

“Another grandson is Rajah Lakandula who took over Tondo during the untimely demise of Rajah Soliman. The 3rd eldest grandson is Rajah Gat Mauban who is married to the daughter of Bornean Sultan Abdul Kahar, the Sultan of Brunei. Rajah Soliman had a son named Prince Lacan Tagean that was adopted from his grandmother Margarett Acuña Macleod Tagean.  The Prince was married to Princess Rowena Ma. Elizabeth Overbeck of Austria and in the same manner has a begotten son who is the Prince Julian Macleod Tallano who is married to Princess Aminah Kiram and their descendant Rajah Magat Salamat took over the area of Cagayan Valley, while Rajah Baginda, another grandson had covered the area of Bohol, and Rajah Lapulapu, the eldest son of the King took over the Island of Mactan, while Rajah Kolambo, the 8th grandson is the ruler of the Island of Cebu.  Rajah Gat Mauban took the eastern part of the Province of Quezon including Mauban, Sampaloc and Lukban to protect the interest of his grandson Vicente Lukban.”

At this point, I feel that we are really missing a lot of pieces that this story seems to supply. From the version of history taught in schools, Lapulapu, Rajah Soliman, and Rajah Baginda are presented as chieftains of local tribes. There was not much hint from any of our history books that these leaders are actually blood relatives and are governing the people in the name of their father/grandfather, King Luisong Tagean.

“For reference, Manila started some thousand years ago, born out from the very womb of Rio de Tagean (now Pasig) river. The seat of the most powerful Datu, the King Luisong Tagean, which was inherited by his son Rajah Soliman and later by his grandson Lacan Tagean and his Royal Family, was not in Manila but in Lamayan District, now the Malacanang Palace. The evolution of Tagean Clan into Tallano Clan served as catalyst in their claims and interest in land against the Spanish government until such time when foreign intervention, like the British Royal Government started in l76l, had successfully invaded and liberated the Filipino people from the Spanish colonization in October l4, l764. The American government took its role and settled the inhabitants’ perennial land problems by cessation treaty at the acquisition cost of U.S. Dollar 20 million. Such amount had been provided by Tallano Tagean Clan through the King’s son, Lacan-Tagean Tallano. [Emphasis mine.]  One condition in the said accord, the British and the Spanish governments, and the US government as well, and any foreign dominion, should respect the inhabitants’ private ownership and interest in land.  As a result of this treaty, another treaty, the Treaty of Paris, came into being, also containing the precondition that private rights and interest in lands in the Philippines would be respected [emphasis mine].”

That the 2o million US dollars was actually paid by the Tagean-Tallano clan is something that has eluded the attention of historians. I can’t find any reference to this in the documents of the 1898 Treaty of Paris. Maybe this was supposed to be kept a secret by the royal family and the US government.

Also, this part got me really confused. The cessation treaty where an amount of 20 million US dollars was said to be paid by US to Spain, is no other than the 1898 Treaty of Paris – this is a well-known and well-docmented historical event. One sentence after, the author claims that another treaty was initiated as a result of the earlier treaty and that the latter is called the Treaty of Paris. Were there two treaties in Paris? …. After a little Googling I found that there are at least  three noted historical treaties in Paris – one in 1763, another in1783 and in 1898. However, the author claims that there was another treaty in Paris that was established after 1898; but the succeeding paragraph was even more bewildering, and I quote:

The Treaty of Paris was signed April 4, l894 [emphasis mine]. Upon signing it, the Spanish Royal Crown through its Queen sent Hermogenes and Miguel Rodriguez to the Philippines to assist the recovery of the Hacienda Quebega together with Hacienda Filipina by the Tagean Tallanos. Instead, they connived to carve out some of the best land for themselves.  The Queen commanded them to cease and desist and reconvey from their landholdings the whole Hacienda Filipina, the archipelago with title OCT 0l-4 in the name of Prince Lacan Acuña Tagean-Tallano or to his son Prince Julian Macleod Tallano, the grandson of Alfred Dent, a British Lord and London merchant and part owner of Royal British North Borneo Company.”

If this is not a typographical error, then this a serious case of anachronism, unless the author has a different chronology of the historical events of the world (i.e. to put the Treaty of Paris of 1898 at a year or years earlier than 1894). I invite the author, if he ever lands on this page, to correct this discrepancy or to correct my understanding about these events.

Actually, this is a just part of a long and complex history of our country’s royal family.  Our courts are witnesses of this story and it is said that the story of the royal family or the Tagean-Tallano clan can be recounted from court documents. And there are even more interesting aspects of the story that I will write about in my next posts .

The Tagean-Tallano clan claims ownership of the whole Philippine archipelago and boasts that this ownership was recognized by the Spanish, British, and American colonizers. The descendants of the royal family is in a possession of 720,000 metric tons of gold…a portion of which (about 400,000 metric tons) was deposited in the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, which rests there until now. This is for me, the most interesting part of the story.

I understand that the whole story of the royal family, their claim of ownership of the whole archipelago, and their bullions of gold is very extensive that I can only scratch its surface in this blog article. I invite you to read more if you are interested to investigate this matter yourself. The best place to start is the website of the Tallano Foundation.

Source: sinaglaya.wordpress.com

Source: sinaglaya.wordpress.com

There are so many things that ordinary Filipinos do not know about their national hero. Even if his two novels (Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo) are being studied in high school and his life and works in college as part of the curriculum, many things have been left out of importance. Many details in the novels have been omitted and some aspects of Rizal’s life have been neglected if not concealed for some reasons.

For instance, it is little known that Rizal was actually a deist. He had a firm belief in God but he rejected revealed religion. When we say revealed religion, it refers to a religion that bases its teachings on a supposed revelation from God contained in “holy books” and/or traditions handed down from generations to generations. One can read Rizal’s exposition on this subject in his correspondence with a Jesuit priest, Fr. Pablo Pastells, who was actually his spiritual director during his youthful years in Ateneo. The exchange occurred when Rizal was in an exile in Dapitan and when Fr. Pastells was already the Superior of the Philippine Mission of the Society of Jesus.

In his third letter to Pastells, our national hero explained:

“Through reasoning and by necessity, rather than through faith, do I firmly believe in the existence of a creative Being. Who is he? I do not know. What human sounds, what accents are we to use in pronouncing the name of this Being whose works overwhelm the imagination? Can anyone give him an adequate name, when a small creature on this earth with power so fleeting carries two or three names, three or four surnames, and many more titles and designations? We call him Dios but this only comes from the Latin Deus and ultimately from the Greek Zeus. What kind of being is he? I would attribute to him, to an infinite degree, all the beautiful and holy qualities my mind can think of, but the fear of my ignorance constrains me. Someone has said that everyone conjures up his own God in his own image and likeness. And if my memory serves me right, it was Anacreon who said that if a bull could form an image of God, it would imagine with horns and mooing in a superlative degree. Even so I venture to think of him as infinitely wise, mighty, good (my idea of the infinite is imperfect and confused), when I behold the wonders of his works, the order that reigns over the universe, the magnificence and expanse of creation, and the goodness that shines in all.”

“Unable to pass judgement on what surpasses my powers, I settle for studying God in his creatures like myself and in the voice of my conscience, which only can have come from him. I strive to read and find his will in all that surrounds me and in the mysterious sentiment speaking from within me, which I strive to purify above all else.”

Thus, Rizal’s belief in a Deity was based on reasonable reflection of nature as well as from conscience and not on faith or divine revelation. On the same letter, Rizal expressed his disbelief on the teachings of ancient sacred books. He writes:

“The various religions claim to have God’s will condensed and written in books and dogmas; but apart from the many contradictions, conflicting interpretations of words, and many obscure and untenable points I find in them, my conscience, my reason cannot admit that he who like a wise father had provided his creatures with everything necessary for this life, proceeded to bury what was necessary for eternal life in the obscurities of a language unknown to the rest of the world and hide it behind metaphors and deeds that go against the very laws of nature. Is it possible that he who makes the sun rise for all and the air to blow everywhere to give life, he who has endowed everyone with intelligence and reason for life here on earth, has also hidden from us what is most necessary for our eternal life? What shall we say of a father who heaps candies and toys on his children, but gives food only to one of them, educates and rears him alone? And what if it so happens that this chosen one refuses to eat while the others die looking for food?”

But Rizal goes to qualify his denial of revelation. He only denied special revelation that came through ancient books or traditions. He pointed it out in his fourth letter to Fr. Pastells that:

“I believe in revelation, but in the living revelation of nature which surrounds us everywhere, in the voice speaking out through nature – powerful, eternal, incorruptible, clear, distinct, and universal as the Being from which it comes. It is this revelation that I believe in, which speaks to us and penetrates our being from the day we are born to the day we die. Can any other books reveal to us more faithfully God’s work, his goodness, his love, his providence, his eternity, his glory, his wisdom? ‘The heavens tell the glory of the Lord, and the firmament proclaims his handiwork. Ps 19:1’ Must humanity look for other gospels in order to love God? Do you not believe that men did wrong when they looked for God’d will in scrolls and temples instead of the wonders of nature under the majestic canopy of the skies? Instead of interpreting obscure passages or phrases which provoked hatreds, wars, and dissensions, would it not have been preferable to interpret the facts of nature the better to shape our lives according to its inviolable laws and utilize its resources for our perfection?”

It is then obvious that Rizal was neither Catholic nor Protestant or any other religion you know. He just came to the conclusion that God exists through reasoning and through studying nature and not from any suspicious and contradictory revelation. I advise you get hold of these exchanges with Fr. Pastells. You can also read the honest and equally intelligent replies of Fr. Pastells, which makes their exchange mentally stimulating and really interesting. But in the end, Rizal remained unmoved. He was not convinced by the priest’s arguments as was clearly expressed in his last letter.

Therefore, our national hero, who has studied these matters carefully, came to arrive at a very simple religious philosophy that was attuned to be one of the foundations of the Filipino nation; attuned to his aspirations of independence, academic and religious freedom for our country.

Reference:

Bonoan, Raul J., S.J. 1994. The Rizal-Pastells Correspondence. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press. pages 121-216

Note: This is a revised version of the article by the same author that was published at Relijournal.com, the link to the article is http://www.relijournal.com/Religion/Dr.-Jose-Rizal:-The-Foremost-Filipino-Deist.6072.